Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close

Obama loosens sanctions on C-130s to China

Timing of waiver questioned by critics

Mugshot**FILE** In this August 2, 2003 photo, a U.S. Coast Guard C-130 aircraft flies over the waters off the southwest coast of Eleuthera in the Bahamas. (Associated Press)
Social Networks
facebookFacebook
twitterTwitter

President Obama issued a waiver loosening Tiananmen arms sanctions for C-130 military transports for China a day after the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to an imprisoned Chinese dissident who dedicated the prize this past weekend to the victims of the 1989 crackdown.

Chinese state-run news media on Monday hailed the White House waiver announcement as a sign Washington is moving to lift the 11-year-old arms embargo.

However, White House National Security Council spokesman Michael Hammer said the waiver issued on Saturday will not allow C-130s sales. "Under this announcement, we are not selling any aircraft to anyone," he stated in an e-mail.

Mr. Obama's letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announcing the waiver states that it is lifting a ban on "temporary munitions export licenses" for C-130s that currently is banned by the fiscal 1990 Foreign Relations Act. The law bars sales to China of "any defense item on the U.S. Munitions Control list" unless "the president makes a report" waiving the restriction.

Mr. Hammer said the waiver is intended to assist companies in Southeast Asia that use C-130s for cleaning up oil spills. The waiver will permit C-130s to land in China to refuel, or take on chemicals used in dispersing oil spills, after first obtaining a U.S. export license, he said.

Sharon Hom, executive director of Human Rights in China, said the lack of any urgent oil spill emergency and the timing of the waiver so close to the Nobel award "sends a mixed signal to the Chinese leadership and undercuts President Obama's call for Liu Xiaobo's release, especially in light of the June 4 genesis of the U.S. export ban."

The waiver announcement and China's view of it also raised concerns among some specialists who view it as a step by the Obama administration toward eventually lifting the arms embargo.

"The C-130 proposal is obviously a toe in the water and, as such, should be rejected," said John Bolton, former undersecretary of state for international security. "This administration seems to have two messages about America for foreign governments: weak and weaker."

Edward Timperlake, a former Pentagon technology security official, agreed: "This will ultimately undermine Tiananmen sanctions because the Chinese state-controlled media is hyping that as their objective."

"A very courageous Chinese citizen just received the Nobel Prize, and his wife has been placed under house arrest — announcing this waiver now makes a mockery of any administration pretense of supporting human rights, regardless of the expedient environmental fig-leaf justification," Mr. Timperlake said.

Story Continues →

© Copyright 2010 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author
Bill Gertz

Bill Gertz

Bill Gertz is geopolitics editor and a national security and investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He has been with The Times since 1985.

He is the author of six books, four of them national best-sellers. His latest book, “The Failure Factory,” on government bureaucracy and national security, was published in September 2008.

Mr. Gertz also writes a weekly column ...

Comments

chiefgalles says:

39 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

There are no countries who warrant our continued improvement in military equipment he said. There are no foreseeable enemies who could challenge us at sea, he said. It is too bad that we cannot discern just when we will get hit by either Iran or China and put all of the politicians who have destroyed our preeminence in space, air and sea aboard the whoops platform. You know, The one that gets blown away just before we say whoops, we might have reduced our forces too much. Gray is attempting to rival the Naval treaties of the 1930's, without getting any reductions of the enemy forces. (Enemy - any force that demonstrates hostility to U.S. positions or policies and is developing a stronger military at the same time.)

TxnByBrth says:

2 hours, 20 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

This waiver is a continuation of the growing relationship between Chinese contributions to the Democratic Party's campaign funds (beginning with Al Gore) and as a continuation of their Quid Pro Quo. The current administration is merely carrying out the wishes and dictates of the Democratic National Committee's mandates/directives...quid pro quo.

rgbcwd says:

2 hours, 52 minutes ago

Mark as offensive

This is the third time I've tried to post a comment on this story. For some reason my criticizam of Obama, Bill Clinton and China is not acceptable.

View all comment(s) on this article.

Post a comment

Title

Not Registered Yet?

Comment on articles. Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts. Sign up today.

Happening Now

Please click for more

Most Read

    Independent voices from the TWT Communities

    Forbidden Table Talk

    Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.

    Run, Karla, Run!

    Notes from a running nerd: musings and more on all things running.

    After Hours at The Brew Lounge

    Exploring the stories behind the passionate pursuit of great beer

    Haydon's Soccer Pitch

    Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League.